How To's Featured

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM): A Detailed Guide for Cybersecurity Defence

CTEM is a proactive cybersecurity approach that continuously monitors, assesses, and mitigates threats like ransomware and data breaches. It enhances risk prioritisation, compliance, and cost efficiency while staying updated with evolving cyber threats through advisories.

Cybersec Sentinel

Oct 5, 2024 • 13 min read

In today’s digital landscape, cyber threats such as ransomware, malware, and data breaches are escalating in frequency and sophistication. To effectively manage these risks, Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) has emerged as a proactive and holistic approach that addresses these evolving dangers. This article explores what CTEM is, why organisations should adopt it, and the steps Cybersecurity Analysts and System Administrators can take to implement it. Additionally, it discusses the importance of keeping up with the latest threat advisories to pre-empt and counter emerging attacks.

What is CTEM?

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) is a cybersecurity framework designed to provide ongoing, real-time visibility into an organisation’s digital environment, with the aim of continuously identifying and managing vulnerabilities. As opposed to traditional security practices, which often rely on periodic vulnerability scans or one-off penetration tests, CTEM integrates continuous monitoring and proactive risk management into the core of an organisation’s cybersecurity strategy. This approach is increasingly essential given the complexity of today’s digital ecosystems, where threats are constantly evolving and new vulnerabilities can emerge at any time.

CTEM provides a more holistic view of an organisation’s security posture, encompassing not only known vulnerabilities but also configuration issues, identity management gaps, and potential weak points across all systems, devices, applications, and networks. These are typically overlooked by traditional approaches that focus primarily on system patching or specific software vulnerabilities. In addition, CTEM considers the wider threat landscape, meaning it takes into account factors like ongoing cyberattacks in the industry, common attack vectors used by cybercriminals, and other indicators that inform which vulnerabilities should be prioritised.

The core goal of CTEM is to shift from a reactive model to one that is continuously adaptive and preemptive. Instead of waiting for a breach or attack to trigger a response, CTEM allows organisations to anticipate potential threats, remediate vulnerabilities, and strengthen their defences on an ongoing basis.

The Five Phases of CTEM

At the heart of CTEM is a five-step cyclical process designed to provide continuous threat visibility, prioritisation, and remediation. Each step builds on the other to ensure that every part of an organisation’s attack surface is properly managed.

Scoping: This phase involves defining the full extent of the organisation’s digital attack surface. It goes beyond conventional IT infrastructure to include all endpoints, networks, cloud environments, and any third-party services that might present potential entry points for attackers. Scoping is critical because it ensures the CTEM program is comprehensive, identifying every possible risk vector across the organisation.
Discovery: During the discovery phase, organisations conduct a thorough investigation to uncover any vulnerabilities or misconfigurations in their digital environment. This includes using automated tools to scan systems, applications, and networks for potential weaknesses. Discovery is a continuous process, as new vulnerabilities can emerge at any time, especially with the introduction of new technologies or updates to existing systems.
Prioritisation: Not all vulnerabilities are equally dangerous. In this phase, organisations use risk-based criteria to prioritise which vulnerabilities need to be addressed first. The focus is on identifying the vulnerabilities that are most likely to be exploited by attackers and which could cause the most damage to critical assets. Factors like the severity of the vulnerability, its exploitability, and the potential business impact are considered when ranking risks.
Validation: Validation ensures that any remediation efforts are effective. This can be achieved through Breach and Attack Simulations (BAS), penetration tests, or other controlled assessments that test the security measures put in place. The goal is to ensure that vulnerabilities are properly patched or mitigated and that new threats have not emerged due to changes in the environment.
Mobilisation: Finally, mobilisation involves operationalising the findings from the previous phases. This means patching vulnerabilities, updating configurations, deploying security fixes, and ensuring that all relevant stakeholders, including IT, security, and business teams, are informed and involved in the process. Continuous collaboration is crucial to maintaining a strong security posture.

CTEM vs Traditional Vulnerability Management

The major difference between CTEM and traditional vulnerability management lies in the frequency and depth of analysis. Traditional models typically involve periodic scans—perhaps quarterly or annually—that produce static reports detailing vulnerabilities at a particular point in time. While these reports are valuable, they can quickly become outdated in today’s fast-paced threat landscape. New vulnerabilities might emerge between scans, leaving the organisation vulnerable for long periods.

In contrast, CTEM involves continuous scanning and analysis, ensuring that organisations have real-time insight into their vulnerabilities. Moreover, CTEM goes beyond simply identifying software vulnerabilities; it encompasses misconfigurations, endpoint vulnerabilities, and broader issues related to the organisation’s overall security posture. By integrating threat intelligence, CTEM also takes into account external threats and trends that may affect the prioritisation of certain vulnerabilities.

Benefits of CTEM

Proactive Threat Management: One of the most significant advantages of CTEM is its proactive approach. By continuously monitoring for vulnerabilities, organisations can address weaknesses before they are exploited, significantly reducing the likelihood of a breach.
Real-Time Visibility: CTEM provides real-time visibility into an organisation’s threat exposure, allowing security teams to respond quickly to emerging threats and vulnerabilities. This constant awareness is crucial for adapting to the fast-changing nature of cyberattacks.
Improved Resource Allocation: With CTEM’s prioritisation capabilities, organisations can focus their resources on the most critical vulnerabilities, ensuring that time and effort are spent where they are most needed. This optimised resource allocation helps improve the overall efficiency of the security program.
Comprehensive Coverage: Unlike traditional approaches that may focus narrowly on software patches, CTEM provides comprehensive coverage across the entire attack surface, including network vulnerabilities, identity management gaps, and cloud security issues.
Enhanced Decision-Making: CTEM generates actionable insights that help business leaders make informed decisions about cybersecurity investments. This ensures that security efforts are aligned with the organisation’s overall goals and risk tolerance.
Compliance: Many industries have stringent cybersecurity regulations, and CTEM helps organisations meet these requirements by providing a structured, repeatable process for managing and reporting vulnerabilities.

By adopting CTEM, organisations can not only reduce their exposure to cyber threats but also build a more resilient and adaptable cybersecurity program.

Steps to Implement CTEM

Implementing Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) requires a shift in how organisations approach cybersecurity. It is not just about setting up new tools but about integrating a continuous, proactive mindset into the organisation’s security culture. Below are the detailed steps to successfully implement CTEM within your organisation.

1. Scoping the Attack Surface

The first step in CTEM implementation is to identify the full extent of the organisation’s digital attack surface. This goes beyond what traditional security measures cover, such as servers, networks, and applications, and includes new technologies like cloud environments, remote work setups, IoT devices, and third-party services. Scoping should also consider potential vulnerabilities associated with software dependencies, the supply chain, and vendor integrations.

During this phase, it’s crucial to work closely with various departments, including IT, DevOps, and business units, to understand how their operations interact with the overall digital infrastructure. Collaboration is key, as each department might use different technologies, tools, or services that contribute to the overall attack surface. For example, remote workers might access systems using insecure networks or personal devices, expanding the potential entry points for attackers.

Once the scope is defined, it’s important to create an inventory of assets. This includes a comprehensive list of hardware, software, cloud services, and any third-party applications used by the organisation. With this information, organisations can begin to map out the most critical areas that need protection, often referred to as the organisation’s “crown jewels.”

2. Continuous Discovery of Vulnerabilities

Once the attack surface has been scoped, the next step is to continuously discover vulnerabilities across all digital assets. Traditional vulnerability management focuses on periodic scans, but CTEM mandates that this process be ongoing. Continuous discovery ensures that organisations are constantly aware of new vulnerabilities that emerge from software updates, misconfigurations, or changes in infrastructure.

To achieve this, organisations should leverage automated vulnerability scanning tools. These tools are designed to scan the entire IT environment, including systems, networks, applications, and endpoints, for security gaps. These scanners must be configured to run on a regular basis, ensuring that newly introduced vulnerabilities are detected in real time.

In addition to automated scanning, it is essential to incorporate manual assessments where necessary. Manual assessments by security experts, such as penetration testing, can reveal complex vulnerabilities that automated tools might overlook. This combination of automated and manual assessments provides a layered approach to vulnerability discovery, ensuring that nothing slips through the cracks.

This discovery phase should also include the detection of misconfigurations and weak identity management protocols, as these are common targets for cybercriminals. Cloud environments, in particular, are often misconfigured due to their complexity, making them a significant focus during this phase.

3. Prioritisation of Risks

Not all vulnerabilities present the same level of risk, which is why prioritisation is a key component of CTEM. Once vulnerabilities are discovered, they need to be analysed based on several criteria, including their severity, exploitability, and potential business impact. The aim here is to ensure that the most critical vulnerabilities are addressed first.

Prioritisation involves understanding the threat landscape and how external factors could affect the organisation’s specific vulnerabilities. For instance, if there is a widespread exploit targeting a specific vulnerability in widely-used software (like a critical CVE in an operating system), this vulnerability should be prioritised higher than others.

Additionally, prioritisation requires understanding the business context of vulnerabilities. For example, a vulnerability in a system that handles sensitive customer data or financial transactions should be ranked higher than a vulnerability in a system used for less critical functions, even if both vulnerabilities are technically severe.

Organisations should employ risk-scoring frameworks to assign a risk score to each vulnerability. These frameworks use a combination of factors, including vulnerability severity, asset criticality, potential business impact, and threat intelligence, to produce a clear, data-driven prioritisation model.

4. Validation through Testing

Once vulnerabilities have been prioritised and remediation efforts are underway, it is critical to validate the effectiveness of these efforts. Validation involves testing the organisation’s defences to ensure that vulnerabilities have been properly mitigated and that the systems are resilient to potential attacks.

The validation process typically involves using Breach and Attack Simulations (BAS) or penetration testing to mimic the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of real-world attackers. This helps to identify any gaps in the organisation’s defences that may not have been addressed during the remediation process.

Another critical component of validation is the use of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) tools. These systems continuously monitor and analyse security data from across the organisation, providing real-time insights into the effectiveness of remediation efforts and identifying new vulnerabilities or threats as they emerge.

In addition to technical validation, organisations should regularly audit their security processes. Audits help ensure that all remediation efforts are documented and that security teams are following the proper procedures for responding to vulnerabilities.

5. Mobilisation and Collaboration

The final step of CTEM implementation is to mobilise the entire organisation to act on the findings from the previous steps. This includes applying security patches, updating configurations, deploying additional security controls, and ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and involved in the remediation process.

Mobilisation requires effective communication between security teams, IT, DevOps, and business units. Security should not be viewed as an isolated function but as an integral part of the organisation’s operations. It’s essential to have clear policies and processes in place to ensure that any vulnerabilities discovered are addressed in a timely and coordinated manner.

Additionally, continuous training and education for staff are key to the mobilisation phase. Security teams must be well-trained to handle new and emerging threats, while non-security personnel should be educated about best practices for maintaining a secure environment, such as strong password management, phishing awareness, and proper use of secure networks.

Security automation tools, such as Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platforms, can help streamline the mobilisation process. These tools automate much of the remediation work, allowing security teams to focus on more strategic tasks.

Finally, the success of CTEM depends on the ability of the organisation to continuously monitor and adapt. Security is not a one-time effort, and mobilisation should be seen as part of an ongoing, iterative process that evolves alongside the organisation’s digital environment and the wider threat landscape.

Staying Informed: Monitoring Cybersecurity Threat Advisories

A critical component of implementing Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) is staying up to date with the latest cybersecurity threats. Cyber adversaries are constantly evolving their tactics, techniques, and procedures, meaning that organisations must maintain a continuous awareness of the threat landscape to properly defend against new risks. This is where cybersecurity threat advisories come into play. These advisories provide crucial updates on emerging vulnerabilities, malware variants, and attack methods, helping organisations adapt their defences accordingly.

Why Monitoring Threat Advisories is Essential

Threat advisories are timely alerts that contain important information about recent cyberattacks, vulnerabilities, and other security issues affecting organisations across industries. They are typically issued by national and international cybersecurity agencies, as well as private cybersecurity firms, and are meant to keep organisations informed about the latest developments in the cyber threat landscape.

Monitoring threat advisories is essential for several reasons:

Awareness of Emerging Threats: Cybercriminals continually develop new malware strains, ransomware variants, and attack vectors. Staying informed about these threats through advisories ensures that organisations can update their defences before attackers have a chance to exploit these vulnerabilities. For instance, ransomware campaigns like LockBit 3.0 and BianLian have been detailed in threat advisories, providing insights into the tactics used by attackers and ways to mitigate the risks.
Real-Time Vulnerability Alerts: Cybersecurity advisories often detail vulnerabilities in commonly used software and hardware. These advisories will typically include Common Vulnerability and Exposure (CVE) details, the severity of the vulnerability, and suggested mitigations. This real-time alerting helps organisations patch critical systems before attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities.
Insights into Exploit Techniques: Advisories frequently provide details on tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by attackers. Understanding how attackers are exploiting vulnerabilities or targeting systems allows organisations to better defend their assets. Threat advisories can also detail indicators of compromise (IoCs) that organisations can use to detect whether they have been targeted by a specific campaign.
Guidance on Mitigation and Response: One of the most valuable aspects of threat advisories is that they often provide actionable steps for mitigating specific risks. This includes patching known vulnerabilities, deploying additional security controls, or adjusting configurations. Some advisories may also include details on how to respond to an attack if it has already occurred, helping organisations limit the damage and recover quickly.
Enhanced Cybersecurity Strategy: By staying current with threat advisories, security teams can adjust their CTEM priorities to focus on the most relevant and urgent threats. This can involve re-prioritising vulnerability management, adjusting incident response plans, or updating access controls. Being responsive to the latest threats allows organisations to be more adaptive in their security strategy, reducing their overall risk exposure.

Sources of Cybersecurity Threat Advisories

To stay informed about the latest cybersecurity threats, organisations need to rely on reputable sources for threat advisories. These sources provide timely and accurate information that helps security teams stay ahead of the latest risks.

Government Agencies: National cybersecurity agencies such as CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency), the FBI, and the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD), via the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), are key providers of threat advisories. These agencies work closely with industries and law enforcement to share up-to-date information about global cyber threats. They often release joint advisories that are critical for organisations operating in specific sectors, such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure.
Private Cybersecurity Firms: In addition to government agencies, many private cybersecurity companies offer threat advisories. Firms like Symantec, Palo Alto Networks, and FireEye provide regular reports and updates about new attack techniques, malware strains, and vulnerabilities. These advisories are often informed by threat intelligence gathered from their global customer base, offering unique insights into how cyberattacks are unfolding across different regions and industries.
Threat Intelligence Platforms: Many organisations utilise dedicated threat intelligence platforms that aggregate and analyse data from multiple sources. These platforms provide customised threat feeds based on an organisation's specific industry or attack surface, enabling more precise threat monitoring. They can also automate the process of ingesting and acting on threat advisories, making it easier for security teams to integrate advisories into their daily operations.

Practical Application of Threat Advisories in CTEM

Integrating threat advisories into the CTEM process is vital to keeping an organisation’s defences up to date. Here’s how this can be done effectively:

Continuous Monitoring: Cybersecurity teams should continuously monitor trusted advisory sources to stay on top of the latest developments. Many organisations set up automatic alert systems that notify them when a new advisory is released. These alerts can be fed into SIEM systems (Security Information and Event Management), allowing teams to correlate advisories with potential risks in their environment.
Rapid Assessment and Action: Once an advisory is received, it should be assessed quickly to determine whether the organisation is at risk. If the advisory details a vulnerability in software used by the organisation, immediate action should be taken to patch the system or mitigate the risk through other security measures. CTEM frameworks should be flexible enough to rapidly integrate these updates and adjust risk prioritisation accordingly.
Incorporation into Security Audits: Threat advisories often include indicators of compromise (IoCs), which can be used during security audits to check whether the organisation has already been targeted by a particular threat. Regular auditing of systems against the latest advisories can help identify hidden risks that might not have been detected through normal vulnerability management practices.
Incident Response Planning: Advisories frequently provide guidance on how to respond to specific types of attacks, such as ransomware. This information should be used to update incident response plans, ensuring that the organisation is prepared to act swiftly and effectively in the event of a breach.
Training and Awareness: It's essential to incorporate findings from threat advisories into staff training programs. Employees should be made aware of new phishing schemes, malware, and social engineering tactics highlighted in the advisories. By fostering a culture of awareness, organisations can reduce the likelihood of human error being exploited by attackers.

By staying informed through continuous monitoring of cybersecurity threat advisories, organisations can ensure that their CTEM framework remains dynamic and responsive to the latest threats. This proactive approach allows them to adapt to the rapidly changing threat landscape, ensuring that their security posture is as strong and resilient as possible. Regularly reviewing and acting on advisories is a critical part of maintaining a robust defence strategy in today's cybersecurity environment.

Conclusion

CTEM offers a comprehensive, continuous, and proactive approach to managing the ever-expanding cyber threats faced by organisations. By implementing a well-rounded CTEM strategy and keeping up to date with the latest cybersecurity threat advisories, organisations can strengthen their cyber resilience, reduce the likelihood of breaches, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. This dynamic, integrated approach is essential in today’s rapidly evolving threat landscape.

CTEM Podcast Discussion (NotebookLM)

Continuous Threat Exposure Management CTEM A Detailed Guide for Cybersecurity Defence

0:00

/1366.76